Hadith 5221

(1) His statement: “there will be no Kisra after him” etc.: Al-Shafi’i and other scholars said this means there will be no Kisra in Iraq nor Caesar in Sham as it was in his time. We know their rule ceased in these regions. As for Kisra, his rule ended entirely, torn apart completely and eradicated by the Prophet’s call. As for Caesar, he was driven out of Sham to the farthest reaches of his lands, and the Muslims conquered their lands, which became settled for the Muslims, praise be to Allah. (As stated by An-Nawawi in his commentary on Muslim)

(۱) قوله: فلا يكون كسرى بعده إلخ : قال الشافعي وسائر العلماء: معناه لا يكون كسرى بالعراق ولا قيصر بالشام كما كان في زمنه ، فعلمنا بانقطاع ملكهما في هذين الأقليمين، فكان كما قال ، فأما كسرى فانقطع ملكه، وزال بالكلية من جميع الأرض، وتمزق ملكه كل ممزق، واضمحل بدعوة رسول الله ، وأما قيصر فانهزم من الشام، ودخل أقاصي بلاده، فافتح المسلمون بلادهما، واستقرت للمسلمين، والله الحمد، قاله النووي في شرحه للمسلم.